Government Reform Minority Office Politics & Science - Investigating the State of Science Under the Bush Administration Politics & Science -- Investigating the State of Science Under the Bush Administration

Investigative Areas
Scientific Committees
Public Information
Scientific Research
Issue Areas
ENVIRONMENT
Yellowstone
Agricultural Pollution
Arctic Drilling
Enviro. Committees
Oil and Gas Practices
Protecting Wetlands
Global Warming Science
PUBLIC HEALTH
Healthcare Disparities
Abstinence-Only
Breast Cancer Risks
Condom Effectiveness
Drinking Water
HIV/AIDS Research
Prescription Drug Ads
Stem Cell Research
Substance Abuse
Reproductive Health
Lead Poisoning
FEDERAL AGENCIES
EPA
NIH
OMB
OTHER
Bioethics Council
Missile Defense
Workplace Safety
Education Policy

 


 

Prescription Drug Advertising

The FDA distorted scientific evidence to suggest that "most" physicians agreed that their patients asked more thoughtful questions as a result of viewing prescription drug advertisements -- a finding that supports the position of the pharmaceutical industry.

There is ongoing debate on the value of prescription drug advertising directed at consumers, including television advertising. Pharmaceutical companies, which spend $2.5 billion on such advertising, contend that the messages inform patients and improve health care.[1] On the other hand, some independent experts have found that the advertisements often confuse and mislead patients.[2] A recent FDA report distorted scientific evidence on this issue in a manner that supports the position of the pharmaceutical industry.

In an FDA Talk Paper, dated January 13, 2003, the agency claimed that the results of a survey of 500 physicians “confirm that DTC advertising, when done correctly, can serve positive public health functions.”[3] The Talk Paper then listed “highlights” of the study, including the finding that “most [physicians] agreed that, because their patients saw a DTC ad, he or she asked more thoughtful questions during the visit.” The result referred to a question in which physicians were asked to recall their last interaction with a patient about a direct-to-consumer advertisement. In fact, the actual findings were that 59% of physicians responded that the interaction had no beneficial effects and just 4% felt that the advertisement had informed or educated the patient.[4]

The Talk Paper also highlighted that “one effect of DTC ads was to help educate patients about their health problems, and to provide greater awareness of treatments.”[5] FDA’s summary did not mention, however, that 65% of physicians said DTC advertisements caused confusion about relative risks and benefits.[6]

While the Talk Paper did mention a few of the negative results in the study, each was quickly countered by an upbeat message. The result was that FDA turned a balanced study into an endorsement of direct-to-consumer advertisements.[7]

 

[1] Meredith B. Rosenthal et al., Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers, New England Journal of Medicine, 498–505 (Feb. 14, 2003).

[2] Minority Staff, Government Reform Committee, U.S. House of Representatives, Expert Evaluation of Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Advertisements (online at http://www.house.gov/reform/min/
inves_prescrip/prescrip_drug_ads.htm).

[3] FDA, FDA Talk Paper: FDA Releases Preliminary Results of Physician Survey on Direct-to-Consumers Rx Drug Advertisements (Jan. 13, 2003).

[4] Kathryn J. Aikin, Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Prescription Drugs: Physician Survey Preliminary Results, slides 10–11, (Jan. 13, 2003).

[5] FDA, supra note 3.

[6] Kathryn J. Aikin, supra note 4, at slide 36.

[7] FDA, supra note 136.


 
   Presented by Rep. Henry A. Waxman, Ranking Member, Committee on Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives